ArticleBiomedical engineering and computational biology2026
Leveraging Clinical Data for Early Heart Disease Prediction: A Machine Learning Approach With Interpretability Analysis.
Article in Biomedical engineering and computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart disease remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, highlighting the need for early and accurate diagnosis to support effective prevention and treatment strategies. Methods: This study presents a machine-learning-based approach for predicting heart disease using clinical and demographic data from a publicly available dataset. Four widely used classification algorithms-Logistic Regression, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Decision Trees-were evaluated to identify the most effective predictive model. The dataset underwent comprehensive preprocessing, including handling missing values, categorical encoding, and feature normalization, to enhance data quality and model robustness. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, and AUC-ROC metrics. Results: Findings show that hyperparameter-optimized models, particularly Random Forest and KNN, demonstrated strong predictive performance. Explainability techniques, specifically SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), were incorporated to improve interpretability, transparency, and clinical trust. SHAP values were used to analyze feature importance and provide explanations for individual predictions. Conclusion: The results underscore the potential of interpretable machine-learning models as valuable tools for early diagnosis, risk stratification, and clinical decision support. Future research should employ larger datasets and investigate real-time predictive applications further to enhance the generalizability and clinical utility of these models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.