ArticleCureus2026
Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity in Non-traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Analysis From the Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Academic University.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParoxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) can occur in comatose patients with a history of non-traumatic brain injury. In the intensive care unit, it is very challenging to diagnose such a condition, as there are a lot of masquerades.
methodsThis was a retrospective study, which screened case records of adult patients (age > 18 years), referred to a 26-bed intensive care unit of a tertiary care academic university, admitted with a comatose state, either post-cardiac arrest status with presumptive diagnosis of hypoxic ischemic brain injury, or patients with suspected meningo-encephalitis for a period of one year. Patient case files suggestive of a history of traumatic brain injury, stroke, epilepsy, and autonomic dysfunction were excluded. Case files with a Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity-Assessment Measure (PSH-AM) score ≥17 were included. The case files were reviewed for a period of two weeks starting from the day PSH was diagnosed, and the outcome was assessed in terms of changes in PSH-AM scores and Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E) at ICU discharge.
resultsThe prevalence of PSH was 17% in comatose patients with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (n = 04) and acute meningo-encephalitis (n = 03). There were seven patients with a diagnosis of probable PSH (PSH-AM score ≥17). The median age of the study cohort was 41 years (35-48 years). The median value of severity of illness at ICU admission as assessed by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) was 19 (13-21). The median PSH-AM score was 20 (18-21) at the time of diagnosis of PSH, which was 38 days (21-42 days) from the neurological insult. The PSH score reduced to 5 (3-14) after two weeks of treatment (p < 0.001) with propranolol and clonidine. The median GOS-E of the study population was 2 (2-3).
conclusionA high index of suspicion should be kept for diagnosing PSH in patients with non-traumatic brain injury, particularly those with hypoxic brain injury and encephalitis. Episodic tachycardia, hypertension, diaphoresis, and posturing are important features to suspect PSH in comatose patients with a history of non-traumatic brain injury after ruling out other mimics in the ICU, such as sepsis. The PSH-AM score can be helpful in screening for PSH in such patients. Early identification and management of PSH in such critically ill patients can reduce the number of medical interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.