Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42152962›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026

Clinical and Demographic Factors Associated With Baseline PROMIS Categorization in Shoulder and Elbow Patients.

Matthew W Brewer, Madison R Smith, Jordan S Roylance, Sage A Copling, Zachary A Gehring, Thomas Guffey, Sean M Kennedy, John E Conway, James M Gregory, Natalie L Myers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Matthew W BrewerMcGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8459-4276
Madison R SmithMcGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jordan S RoylanceMcGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sage A CoplingMcGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Zachary A GehringDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Thomas GuffeyCenter of Research Design and Analysis, Texas Woman's University, Denton, Texas, USA.
Sean M KennedyAdventHealth Research Institute, Sports Med and Rehab, Orlando, Florida, USA.
John E ConwayDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
James M GregoryDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3595-7158
Natalie L MyersATI Physical Therapy Institute for Musculoskeletal Advancement, Downers Grove, Illinois, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive tests (CATs) are commonly used in orthopaedics. While prior work has validated PROMIS domains in upper extremity populations, there is limited literature describing associations of clinical and demographic factors with baseline PROMIS score categorization in shoulder and elbow patients. Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that sex, operative status, body mass index (BMI), age, and injured body region would be associated with baseline PROMIS-Pain Interference (PI) and PROMIS-Physical Function (PF) categorization. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed between March 2022 and March 2025. Patients ≥18 years of age with a primary complaint of shoulder or elbow pain were included. PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PF CATs were completed at the initial visit. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine associations of impairment severity (mild, moderate, or severe), with the within normal limits group as the reference category. Independent variables included injured body part, sex, operative status, BMI, and age. A secondary analysis limited to shoulder patients incorporated primary encounter diagnosis as an additional factor. Results: The primary analysis included a cohort of 1324 patients (977 shoulder, 347 elbow; mean age, 53 ± 16 years; 43.7% female). Injured body part was not associated with impairment severity. Among this cohort, women were more likely to demonstrate all levels of PI (OR, 1.38-2.50) and moderate to severe PF impairment (OR, 1.90-3.24). Operative status was associated with greater odds of moderate to severe PI (OR, 2.00-3.78) and PF impairment (OR, 2.40-2.85). BMI ≥30 was associated with greater odds of moderate to severe PI (OR, 1.52-2.45) and all levels of PF impairment (OR, 1.50-2.76). Older age was modestly associated with severe PI and mild to severe PF impairment. In the shoulder-only cohort, rotator cuff pathology and arthritis were associated with lower likelihoods of severe impairment, while adhesive capsulitis was associated with mild to moderate PI but lower odds of severe PF impairment. Conclusion: Female sex, operative status, higher BMI, and advanced age were associated with worse baseline PROMIS-PI and PF categorization, while shoulder-specific diagnoses demonstrated variable associations.

Indexed as

elbowpain interferencephysical functionPROMISshoulder

Identifiers

PMID42152962
PMCPMC13180147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.