ReviewTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2026
The neurotoxic legacy of CAR-T cells: where do we stand?
Review in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CAR-T therapy for immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy: a review of mechanisms and emerging clinical evidence.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Review
- The prospects of CAR T-cell therapies in changing the therapeutic algorithm of neurologic autoimmunities.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has transformed outcomes for relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies and is increasingly reshaping the therapeutic landscape of autoimmune disorders and solid tumors, offering curative potential where options were previously limited. Its broader deployment is, however, constrained by immune-mediated toxicities, chiefly cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). ICANS spans a heterogeneous spectrum from mild aphasia and tremor to seizures, cerebral edema, coma, and death, and remains difficult to predict prospectively. As CAR-T platforms expand beyond CD19 malignancies, neurotoxicity phenotypes are also broadening beyond classical ICANS. In plasma cell dyscrasias, BCMA-directed CAR-T has been associated with delayed non-ICANS neurotoxicities, including movement and neurocognitive/behavioral symptoms, cranial nerve palsies, and peripheral neuropathic presentations. In parallel, early experiences with CAR-T and related immune effector therapies in autoimmune and neuroimmunologic diseases suggest distinct inflammatory contexts and potentially different neurotoxicity patterns, underscoring the need for indication-specific monitoring and attribution frameworks. Converging data implicate a multilayered pathophysiology involving systemic cytokine surges, disruption of the blood-brain barrier, endothelial dysfunction, and context-dependent trafficking of activated CAR-T cells and other immune effectors into the CNS with baseline neurological vulnerability and the peri-infusion inflammatory milieu likely modulating individual risk. Given the frequency of these complications, an active research effort is underway to identify clinical, functional, and biological signals that could predict and improve their management. However, most biomarkers remain investigational, lacking prospective validation and straightforward clinical utility. This review synthesizes current evidence on the epidemiology, mechanisms, and monitoring of ICANS and emerging non-ICANS syndromes, and offers a fresh perspective on integrated, multimodal risk models to enable more precise stratification and timely intervention across indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.