ArticleSAGE open nursing
Nursing Students' Experiences With the Flipped Classroom Approach in a Human Anatomy Course: A Qualitative Study.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The flipped classroom is a blended teaching approach in which students receive content prior to attending face-to-face lessons. It typically comprises three phases: pre-class, in-class and post-class. Previous research has predominantly focused on the flipped classroom in general higher education, nursing education and anatomy education for medical students; however, its specific use in anatomy education among nursing students remains understudied. Objective: This study aimed to explore and describe nursing students' experiences with a flipped classroom in a human anatomy course. Methods: The flipped classroom approach was used once a week for a second-semester human anatomy class for first-year undergraduate nursing students, while the other days adhered to the traditional approach. Subsequently, an exploratory, descriptive qualitative study was conducted, with constructivism as its theoretical foundation. A sample of 18 nursing students was selected through convenience sampling to participate in the study. Data were collected through individual interviews, using an interview guide. The data were transcribed verbatim and then manually thematically analysed, following six stages of the iterative process of analysing interview data. Results: The three themes identified are: the flipped classroom promotes active learning, the flipped classroom is not the preferred method for learning human anatomy, and improving the flipped classroom approach. Conclusion: Findings indicate both positive and negative experiences with the flipped classroom in human anatomy. These may help develop a step-by-step guide to teaching human anatomy using the flipped classroom approach. Future researchers might explore how the flipped classroom can be utilised to enhance the application of human anatomy in clinical practice among nursing students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.