ArticleJournal of chiropractic medicine2025
Kinematic Evaluation of Sagittal Spine Motion During Walking With Internal Frame and Frameless Backpacks.
Article in Journal of chiropractic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine sagittal spinal movements during walking with frameless and internal frame backpacks. Methods: Twenty adult students from a chiropractic college walked on a treadmill while wearing inertial measurement units mounted on the head, T1 and T12 vertebrae, and sacrum. They walked without a backpack, with a backpack loaded with 6.8 kg, and after 15 minutes walking with the loaded pack. Day 1, they wore a backpack with no structural support; day 2, they wore an internal frame backpack with a hip belt and chest compression straps. Cyclic sagittal flexion and extension endpoints were identified using an application written in the R language. Results: Participants walked with the lumbar spine in slight flexion throughout all trials with both packs; flexion significantly increased with load and with time, more so with the frameless pack. The thoracic region showed progressive extension with load and time, significant only for the frameless pack. The cervical region trended toward progressive extension with load and time, with no significant changes for either pack. Conclusion: In this group of adult students walking on a treadmill, there were trends of increasing lumbar flexion, thoracic extension, and cervical extension, with changes more pronounced with a frameless backpack than one with an internal frame.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.