Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42152930›Full record

ArticleJournal of chiropractic medicine2025

Use of Remote Consultations by Chiropractors in the United Kingdom During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Marc W Sanders, Jonathan Field, Dave Newell, Neil Osborne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chiropractic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marc W SandersAECC School of Chiropractic, Health Sciences University, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.
Jonathan FieldCentre for Primary Care and Population Studies, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Dave NewellAECC School of Chiropractic, Health Sciences University, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.
Neil OsborneAECC School of Chiropractic, Health Sciences University, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore the use of remote consultations (RCs) by chiropractors in the United Kingdom. Methods: All registered practicing UK chiropractors were invited to participate in an online survey during part of the first UK national lockdown period of the COVID-19 pandemic (May 2020 to June 2020). This survey collected information on 1) chiropractor demographics, 2) use of RCs by chiropractors, and 3) chiropractors' views of RCs. Descriptive and inferential statistics (chi-squared and Spearman's Rho) were used to analyze the data. Results: The response rate was 17.1% (534/3131). A third of respondents (32.5%) had been using RCs (telephone) prior to the pandemic. Two-thirds (67.2%) used RCs during the first lockdown period and included uptake of video consultations (6.6%), phone consultations (30%), or a combination of video and phone (30.7%). A majority (58.6%) responded that they planned to continue RCs after practice restrictions were lifted. Under half (47.8%) gave their opinion that RCs would not be as effective as face-to-face care, a similar proportion (50.1%) stated they were engaging their patients with active care more than typical. Only around a half of the respondents (52.5%) were confident in carrying out RCs. Conclusions: This survey provides preliminary data on RCs delivered by UK chiropractors - a traditionally 'hands-on' profession. Both telephone and video RCs increased during the first UK national lockdown but confidence in carrying out RCs and impressions of their effectiveness was mixed.

Indexed as

ChiropracticCoronavirusCOVID-19Musculoskeletal painSurveys and questionnairesTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID42152930
PMCPMC12803981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.