ArticleJournal of chiropractic medicine2025
Feasibility Considerations of 24-Hour Heart Rate Variability as a Wellness-Focused Biomarker.
Article in Journal of chiropractic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purposes of this study were to (1) evaluate heart rate variability (HRV) monitoring for assessing morning, mid-day, evening, and sleep sample periods; (2) assess study-related procedures, personnel, and physical resources available at our institution; (3) identify potential problems and solutions associated with the use of 24-hour HRV at our institution. Methods: Six participants were fitted with 24-hour HRV recording devices (DMS myPatch-sl) and evaluated under 3 conditions; normal-daily-activity, treadmill-walking, and paced-deep-breathing. In addition, each participant maintained a written event-diary during the evaluation period. Tachograms for sample time periods were reported with representative Fast Fourier Transform Power Analyses. Results: We found that proper ECG electrode patch placement on study participants required specific training and written instructions. The DMS Holter monitor provided good-quality data over the 24-hour period without interfering with normal daily activities. However, there was data loss for 1 hour immediately following exposure of the device to water while showering. Also, there was a need to stabilize the V5 electrode wire to minimize disconnections during sleep. Participant diaries varied considerably in useful information content. Conclusion: The findings for the 6 participants in this study support the feasibility of and inform applying 24-hour HRV assessment in research studies at our institution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.