ArticleJournal of chiropractic medicine2025
Describing Congruence Between ICD-10 Coding and Medical Record Text in Veterans Health Administration Chiropractic Notes.
Article in Journal of chiropractic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the congruence between International Classification of Diseases, 10th Ed (ICD-10) codes and documented text diagnoses from chiropractic notes in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of VHA national administrative data. We randomly sampled 1000 on-station VHA chiropractic visits occurring from October 1, 2017, and September 30, 2018 from patients with no such visits within the prior 12 months. ICD-10 and documented text diagnoses were extracted and mapped to 10 defined categories based on body region, presence of radiculopathy, nonspecific musculoskeletal conditions, and nonmusculoskeletal conditions. A rating system evaluated the congruence between ICD-10 and text diagnoses. Results: Of the 978 identified and abstracted notes, ICD-10 and text diagnoses were perfectly congruent in 441 (45.1%). With cases of partial congruence, ICD-10 codes contained less detail/fewer conditions than text in 194 (19.8%) and contained more detail/more conditions than text in 178 (18.2%). Mixed findings were present in 101 cases (10.3%), with ICD-10 and text both containing diagnoses not found in the other. Lastly, there were 64 cases (6.5%) where the 2 groups had no degree of congruence. Conclusion: VHA chiropractic diagnostic coding and text documentation shows considerable congruence with variability in diagnostic detail. This provides a foundation for further study that may ultimately improve the quality of these data for clinical, research, and administrative uses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.