ArticleDigital health
Evaluating the GRACE voice assistant for dementia care among caregivers and healthcare professionals: An interview study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Considering rising dementia rates, voice assistants are being investigated to support people with dementia (PWD) and reduce the burden on caregivers (CGs). GRACE, an intervention-delivering voice assistant, provides cognitive support and assistance with daily living for people with early-stage dementia. Initial pilot studies showed promising user experience among healthy adults but required further evaluation by care professionals working with PWD as a next reiteration process. Objective: This study investigated three main research questions: (1) Which intervention components of GRACE do healthcare professionals (HCPs) and CGs find most valuable for supporting the daily lives of PWD? (2) What key constraints do HCPs and CGs expect when implementing GRACE in dementia care settings? and (3) What changes or additions do HCPs and CGs recommend for optimizing the functionality of GRACE? Methods: Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted (CG: Results: Respondents found the onboarding activity and memory exercise to be most valuable, due to its relevance in everyday life. Identified barriers for implementation included practical, technical, and ethical challenges. Recommendations for successful implementation and further development of GRACE included improving PWD acceptance and greater artificial intelligence-supported personalized content. Finally, a list of future exercises for incorporation and other use cases of GRACE beyond dementia care were also identified. Conclusions: GRACE has great potential as a complementary tool in dementia care. Ensuring personalization, ease of use, and alignment with care processes will be critical for adoption and long-term success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.