ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2026
EC
Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Regarding anesthesia management for high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of uterine adenomyosis, existing research is limited. While considered non-invasive, HIFU ablation carries risks such as thermal injury to adjacent structures like nerves if the focused energy deviates from the target. Therefore, the procedure requires that patients remain perfectly still while retaining sufficient consciousness to immediately report warning sensations like cutaneous burning or radiating leg pain. This unique requirement renders conventional anesthetic approaches inadequate. General or neuraxial anesthesia impair sensory feedback, while traditional intravenous sedation presents challenges in balancing analgesia with respiratory safety and patient communication. Epidural analgesia with low-concentration ropivacaine offers a potential solution due to its favorable sensory-motor dissociation, which can maintain analgesia and immobility while preserving the patient's ability to communicate. Previous studies support the efficacy of this approach, but the optimal drug concentration remains undefined. This study aimed to determine the median effective concentration (EC Patients and Methods: This prospective study ultimately included 29 patients with adenomyosis undergoing HIFU with intraoperative epidural analgesia. The epidural solution contained ropivacaine (concentrations determined through an up-and-down sequential method, starting at 0.06% for the first patient) and sufentanil 0.5 µg/mL. After a 5 mL test dose, a 15 mL bolus was administered, followed by 10 mL maintenance doses every 40 minutes. Successful analgesia was defined as an intraoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score < 4. Results: The EC Conclusion: These findings provide critical dose references for optimizing intraoperative analgesia during HIFU for adenomyosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.