Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42152815›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2026

EC

Simin Yang, Yang Zhang, Fan Yang, Li Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simin Yang *Department of Anesthesiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0002-4709-2427
Yang Zhang *Department of Anesthesiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Fan YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Li LuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Regarding anesthesia management for high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment of uterine adenomyosis, existing research is limited. While considered non-invasive, HIFU ablation carries risks such as thermal injury to adjacent structures like nerves if the focused energy deviates from the target. Therefore, the procedure requires that patients remain perfectly still while retaining sufficient consciousness to immediately report warning sensations like cutaneous burning or radiating leg pain. This unique requirement renders conventional anesthetic approaches inadequate. General or neuraxial anesthesia impair sensory feedback, while traditional intravenous sedation presents challenges in balancing analgesia with respiratory safety and patient communication. Epidural analgesia with low-concentration ropivacaine offers a potential solution due to its favorable sensory-motor dissociation, which can maintain analgesia and immobility while preserving the patient's ability to communicate. Previous studies support the efficacy of this approach, but the optimal drug concentration remains undefined. This study aimed to determine the median effective concentration (EC Patients and Methods: This prospective study ultimately included 29 patients with adenomyosis undergoing HIFU with intraoperative epidural analgesia. The epidural solution contained ropivacaine (concentrations determined through an up-and-down sequential method, starting at 0.06% for the first patient) and sufentanil 0.5 µg/mL. After a 5 mL test dose, a 15 mL bolus was administered, followed by 10 mL maintenance doses every 40 minutes. Successful analgesia was defined as an intraoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score < 4. Results: The EC Conclusion: These findings provide critical dose references for optimizing intraoperative analgesia during HIFU for adenomyosis.

Indexed as

AdenomyosisAnalgesia, EpiduralAnesthetics, LocalHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationRopivacaineAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSufentanilAnesthetics, LocalRopivacaineSufentaniladenomyosisdose-responsedural puncture epiduralepidural analgesiahigh-intensity focused ultrasoundropivacaine

Identifiers

PMID42152815
PMCPMC13180326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.