Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42152765›Full record

SynthesisEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026

Conduction system pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review.

Georgios Fotos, Nikolaos Ktenopoulos, Konstantinos Vlachos, Apostolos Christou, Maria Agelaki, Anastasios Apostolos, Athanasios Samaras, Justin Luermans, Kevin Vernooy, Konstantinos Tsioufis and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Georgios Fotos1st Cardiology Department, Hellenic Red Cross Hospital, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0009-0008-9772-7797
Nikolaos KtenopoulosFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0995-7015
Konstantinos VlachosHôpital Cardiologique du Haut Léveque, CHU de Bordeaux, L'Institut de RYthmologie et Modelisation Cardiaque (LIRYC), Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7543-3236
Apostolos Christou1st Cardiology Department, Hellenic Red Cross Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Maria Agelaki1st Cardiology Department, Hellenic Red Cross Hospital, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5889-6514
Anastasios ApostolosFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2616-7952
Athanasios Samaras2nd Cardiology Department AUTh, Hippokrateion General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3404-2749
Justin LuermansDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9598-2286
Kevin VernooyDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8818-5964
Konstantinos TsioufisFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-7636-6725
Konstantinos ToutouzasFirst Department of Cardiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Hippokration General Hospital of Athens, Athens 11527, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2946-344X
Dominik LinzDepartment of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4893-0824
Serge BovedaDepartment of Heart Rhythm, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1280-7042

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biventricular pacing (BVP) remains the standard method for delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB). Despite its established role, BVP is a non-physiological pacing approach and is limited by factors such as anatomical constraints of the coronary sinus and a substantial proportion of non-responders. Conduction system pacing (CSP), including His bundle pacing and left bundle branch area pacing, has emerged as a more physiological alternative aimed at optimizing CRT outcomes. Early studies suggest that CSP may achieve superior electro-mechanical ventricular synchrony compared with BVP. Nevertheless, evidence from large-scale randomized controlled trials remains scarce, and challenges related to procedural complexity and insufficient long-term outcome data currently prevent CSP from replacing BVP as the first-line CRT strategy. This systematic review synthesizes the existing literature on CSP in CRT, explores its potential applications across different clinical contexts, and discusses the ongoing controversies and future prospects of this evolving technique.

Indexed as

Bundle-Branch BlockBundle of HisCardiac Resynchronization TherapyHeart Conduction SystemHeart FailureAction PotentialsHeart RateHumansTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, LeftBiventricular pacingConduction system pacingHeart failureHis bundle pacingLeft bundle branch area pacingLeft bundle branch block

Identifiers

PMID42152765
PMCPMC13255998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.