ArticleInternational wound journal2026
Multi-Centre, Single-Arm, Prospective Evaluation of Ovine Forestomach Matrix for the Treatment of Complex Wounds in the South Asian Population.
Article in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute and chronic wounds are a significant clinical and economic challenge worldwide. In India, adoption of advanced bioscaffolds remains constrained by cost, limited healthcare access and cultural/religious beliefs. Ovine forestomach matrix (OFM)-based devices have demonstrated utility in wound bed preparation and soft tissue reconstruction for complex wounds. This prospective multi-centre study evaluated a structured treatment algorithm incorporating OFM-based dressings for wound bed preparation, and grafts for reconstruction. Participants with acute or chronic wounds were assessed weekly for adverse events, granulation tissue coverage, volumetric defect fill and wound closure. Enrolled participants (n = 100) presented with common complicating comorbidities and included mainly traumatic wounds (41%) and diabetic foot ulcers (17%). Most lesions were chronic (60%), large (median area: 40.1 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.