Observational studyDiabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association2026
Type 1 diabetes stigma: A UK survey of adults living with type 1 diabetes.
Observational study in Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsType 1 diabetes stigma (T1D-stigma) refers to negative social judgement towards people living with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and is linked to poorer psychological well-being and suboptimal diabetes self management. This observational study aimed to explore sociodemographic, diabetes health and well-being factors linked to high stigma scores to inform future, targeted intervention studies.
methodsUK-based adults (aged ≥18 years) with T1D completed an online survey comprising sociodemographic and diabetes health questions, wellbeing measures for anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale: GAD-7), diabetes impact (Impact of Diabetes Profile: DIDP) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire: PHQ-9) and the Type 1 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-1). Potential relationships between sociodemographic, diabetes health and well-being factors and DSAS-1 score were identified by univariate regression and the independence of significant (p < 0.05) relationships was explored in multivariable regression.
resultsOf 438 participants, 96% endorsed one or more items on the DSAS-1. In multivariable regression, age (β = -0.136, p = 0.006), sex (β = 0.114, p = 0.006), BMI (β = 0.112, p = 0.023), insulin pump use (β = 0.108, p = 0.015), DIDP score (β = 0.211, p = <0.001), GAD-7 score (β = 0.192, p = 0.002) and PHQ-9 score (β = 0.195, p = 0.002) predicted DSAS-1 score. Ethnicity did not predict DSAS-1 score, nor did age at diagnosis or number of severe hypoglycaemia episodes.
conclusionMost participants reported at least one instance of T1D-stigma. High DSAS-1 scores in the United Kingdom were predicted by younger age, being a woman, higher BMI, insulin pump use, higher diabetes impact and anxiety and depression scores. Future studies should further explore the impact of T1D-stigma within these groups to tailor appropriate interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.