ArticleJournal of paediatrics and child health2026
Pathways to Care for Young People Diagnosed With Functional Tic Like Behaviours in the United Kingdom: An Online Mixed-Methods Survey.
Article in Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to analyse the pathways to obtaining a diagnosis of functional tic-like behaviour (FTLBs) in the United Kingdom.
methodsThe primary caregivers of children with FTLB (n = 55) were recruited through charities and completed an anonymised survey. The authors established the pathway to any diagnosis, gaining information about their child's tics, their impact and the sequence of health-care professionals (HCPs) they had contacted that had either led or not led to a diagnosis and any support on offer. Mixed-method analyses were conducted on the surveys.
resultsMany of the characteristics of the children met the criteria for FTLBs, with over half of the children (n = 30; 55%) also showing self-harming and suicidal ideation behaviour. Mothers reported often finding themselves seeing more than three different services and being given differing labels for their child's symptoms (e.g., transient tics and PANDAS). There was little clear guidance on how to manage symptoms, with those who were able to access treatment offered CBT, counselling and/or medication. There were several families still waiting to be seen (n = 13; 24%); however, of those who had received a diagnosis, almost one-third had accessed support from private healthcare providers (n = 14; 25%).
conclusionsPathways to diagnosis for young people showing FTLBs are complex, time-consuming and can involve multiple health-care contacts, with patients alternating between primary and specialised care. Our findings reflect failures in the diagnostic protocols and referral systems of health care in the United Kingdom and a general lack of understanding, specialist skill or knowledge relating to FTLBs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.