Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42152452›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Better outcomes for the older surgical patient trial (BOOST): protocol for a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial of an embedded geriatric perioperative service within emergency and elective surgery in an Australian tertiary referral hospital.

Clarissa Sagi, Henry Logan, Erica Epstein, Elizabeth Holliday, Stephen Ridley Smith, Jenny Mackney, Christine L Paul, Suzanne Clark-Pitrolo, Donna Gillies, Christine J O'Neill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Clarissa SagiJohn Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia.
Henry LoganJohn Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-0395-6647
Erica EpsteinJohn Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia.
Elizabeth HollidaySchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle Australia, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4066-6224
Stephen Ridley SmithJohn Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia.
Jenny MackneyJohn Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia.
Christine L PaulSchool of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle Australia, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0504-5246
Suzanne Clark-PitroloHunter Medical Research Institute, The University of Newcastle Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia.
Donna GilliesJohn Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia.
Christine J O'NeillJohn Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia christine.oneill@newcastle.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOlder patients admitted under surgical care have longer length of stay (LOS) and are at risk of functional decline, hospital-acquired complications and geriatric syndromes. Embedded specialist geriatrician models within surgical care teams can reduce length of stay and perioperative complications. Evidence gaps remain regarding the implementation of these models of care and their impact on patient outcomes. This study aims to measure hospital, patient and implementation outcomes of an embedded perioperative geriatric service in a large Australian tertiary referral hospital. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation trial involves four services (emergency general, elective general, urology and vascular surgery), with a predicted reach of >2000 patients over 24 months. The intervention consists of a proactive geriatrician-led service providing a comprehensive geriatric assessment and ongoing review during the acute admission. Service evaluation will be via (1) traditional hospital outcomes (primary outcome LOS); (2) implementation outcomes; and (3) patient reported outcomes across three 6 month phases: (1) prior to service implementation; (2) during service implementation and (3) continued service but without active implementation. Data analysis will include descriptive statistics of patient demographics, clinical characteristics and implementation outcomes; cost-effectiveness; univariate and multivariate analysis of outcomes against demographic and clinical characteristics and thematic analysis of qualitative data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has been approved by the Hunter New England Research Ethics Committee (2024_ETH023259). The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. The research team will facilitate adoption more broadly within the health service. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12625000404426).

Indexed as

Elective Surgical ProceduresGeriatricsPerioperative CareAgedAustraliaCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansLength of StayResearch DesignTertiary Care CentersAgedDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedGERIATRIC MEDICINEHospitalizationSURGERY

Identifiers

PMID42152452
PMCPMC13182337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.