Trial reportMedicine2026
Investigating the impact of CBT on reducing impulsive clothing purchases among youths: A cognitive distortion perspective.
Trial report in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImpulsive buying behavior among youths, particularly in relation to clothing, represents a growing psychological and behavioral concern, often driven by cognitive distortions and difficulties in emotion regulation. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has shown promise in addressing maladaptive cognitions and behaviors; however, its targeted application to impulsive clothing purchases remains underexplored. Therefore, this study examined the effect of CBT on impulsive clothing buying behavior among young adults, with a specific focus on cognitive distortions and emotion regulation difficulties.
methodsA total of 122 eligible participants (aged 18-35 years) were recruited through purposive and convenience sampling from local communities, youth centers, and online platforms. Participants were randomly allocated via computer-generated randomization to either a CBT intervention group or a waitlist control group (1:1 ratio). Following attrition, 113 participants (53 in the CBT group and 60 in the control group) completed the study and were included in the final analysis. Only gender information was obtained at baseline, as participants were unwilling to provide additional demographic details. The intervention was delivered over 8 weekly sessions (90 minutes each) by licensed clinical psychologists trained in cognitive-behavioral approaches, under the supervision of a senior CBT consultant to ensure intervention fidelity. The CBT manual was adapted from A Therapist's Guide to Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Standardized measures included the Clothing-Related Impulsive Buying Scale, the Clothing-Related Cognitive Distortions Scale, and the Clothing-Related Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Data were analyzed using analysis of covariance to assess group differences while controlling for pretest scores.
resultsThe CBT group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in impulsive clothing buying behavior (P < .001), cognitive distortions (P < .01), and emotion dysregulation (P < .01) compared with the control group. Effect sizes were moderate to large, indicating a meaningful therapeutic impact.
conclusionCBT delivered by trained and supervised clinical psychologists was effective in reducing impulsive clothing buying behavior by addressing cognitive distortions and enhancing emotion regulation. These findings highlight the potential of tailored CBT interventions for managing impulsive buying tendencies, particularly in fashion-related contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.