Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42152226›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2026

cIMPACT-NOW Update 12: Refining pathology-based risk stratification and grading for IDH-mutant gliomas.

Daniel J Brat, Kenneth Aldape, Pim J French, David N Louis, MacLean P Nasrallah, Guido Reifenberger, David E Reuss, Mehdi Touat, Martin J van den Bent, Pieter Wesseling and 1 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A 38-year-old female with seizures and a cortico-subcortical mass.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Daniel J BratDepartment of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0633-6563
Kenneth AldapeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5119-7550
Pim J FrenchBrain Tumor Center, Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0668-9529
David N LouisDepartment of Pathology, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9423-4099
MacLean P NasrallahDepartment of Pathology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4861-0898
Guido ReifenbergerInstitute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1419-9837
David E ReussDepartment of Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4573-6033
Mehdi TouatDepartment of Neuro-oncology, Sorbonne University, Inserm, CNRS, UMRS 1127, Paris Brain Institute (PBI), AP-HP Sorbonne University, La Pitié Salpêtrière - Charles Foix Hospital Group, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5910-7799
Martin J van den BentBrain Tumor Center, Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5710-5127
Pieter WesselingDepartment of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5453-5201
Dominique Figarella-BrangerAix-Marseille Univ, APHM, CNRS, INP, Institut de Neurophysiopathologie, GlioME Team, CHU Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologique et de Neuropathologie, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3604-887X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A working group of cIMPACT-NOW evaluated the literature on IDH-mutant gliomas for opportunities to improve pathology-based risk stratification and grading, especially at the interface of CNS WHO grades 2 and 3, since therapeutic decisions depend on risk assessment for clinical management. The group also evaluated newly described IDH-mutant glioma subgroups and considered multidisciplinary aspects of therapeutic decision-making. PDGFRA amplification was associated with highly aggressive clinical behavior of IDH-mutant astrocytomas, consistent with CNS WHO grade 4. Other genetic alterations associated with intermediate risk and most consistent with CNS WHO grade 3 included PIK3 mutations; EGFR alteration; MYCN amplification; and specific retinoblastoma pathway alterations, including CDK4, CDK6, and CCND2 amplification, RB1 homozygous deletion or mutation, and mutation of CDKN2A. DNA methylation signatures of G-CIMP-low or A_IDH_HG were consistent with CNS WHO grade 3 or 4, depending upon other grading criteria. We suggest a mitotic count of ≥3 per 2.4 mm2 could be considered as a CNS WHO grade 3 criterion. Our review did not uncover features to improve the grading of oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted, although CNS WHO grade 3 tumors with elevated mitotic rates, yet lacking necrosis, microvascular proliferation, CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion, and MRI contrast enhancement, may be associated with extended survival. Implementing evidence-based criteria for risk stratification and grading will improve guidance for clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationDNA MethylationHumansNeoplasm GradingRisk AssessmentIsocitrate Dehydrogenaseastrocytomabrain tumorgliomaIDH-mutantoligodendroglioma

Identifiers

PMID42152226
PMCPMC13550680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.