ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Mitigating bias in multilabel medical text classification: a cooperative training framework with dynamic debiasing.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Causal spectral segmenter: counterfactual graph reasoning for weakly supervised pathology segmentation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationMedical text classification plays a critical role in clinical decision support, automated diagnosis, and biomedical research. However, deep learning models are highly susceptible to dataset-induced biases, such as label bias and keyword bias, which can lead to unreliable predictions and poor generalization in real-world clinical applications. Existing debiasing methods often either overcorrect informative samples or lack interpretability during inference, limiting their effectiveness in multilabel medical text classification tasks.
resultsWe propose Cooperative Debiasing Network (CoDeNet), a cooperative training framework that mitigates dataset bias through dynamic sample reweighting and interpretable counterfactual inference. The framework consists of a primary classifier and a debias estimator, where the debias estimator quantifies sample-level bias and dynamically regulates the optimization process through an elastic scaling mechanism. In addition, a counterfactual postprocessing strategy explicitly isolates label-level and keyword-level biases to improve interpretability. Experiments conducted on the DepressionEMO and BDI-Sen datasets demonstrate that CoDeNet consistently improves classification performance over strong transformer-based baselines, including BERT and MentalBERT. In particular, CoDeNet achieves improvements of up to +6.57% macro-F1 on BDI-Sen and +2.16% macro-F1 on DepressionEMO, with especially strong gains on low-frequency clinical labels. The results indicate that CoDeNet effectively reduces dataset-induced bias while preserving model robustness and interpretability. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code and implementation details of CoDeNet will be publicly available on GitHub: https://github.com/66ccff39C5BB/CoDeNet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.