Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42152148›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2026

Small teeth, big opportunities: strengthening oral health communication in early years settings.

Eleanor Forshaw, Karen Vinall-Collier, Amrit Chauhan, Jayne Purdy, Sumiah Alnofal, Kara Gray-Burrows, Peter F Day

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eleanor Forshaw *University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1268-1761
Karen Vinall-Collier *University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. k.a.vinall@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6362-9824
Amrit ChauhanUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8919-4934
Jayne PurdyUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Sumiah AlnofalUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0538-7531
Kara Gray-BurrowsUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1550-5066
Peter F DayUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9711-9638

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDental caries remains a significant public health issue across the UK. Early years settings, such as nurseries and preschool playgroups, provide a unique opportunity to promote oral health, yet implementation of oral health interventions varies widely. This study explored early years professionals' and parents' views on oral health activities and conversations undertaken within early years settings in a socioeconomically and ethnically diverse English city.

methodsSemi-structured qualitative interviews and focus groups were undertaken with early years professionals and parents of children aged 0-4 years old. Topic guides were informed by the COM-B model. Interviews and focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymised, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis in NVivo.

resultsSixteen early years professionals and fourteen parents participated. Three key themes were identified. (1) Collaboration between early years settings and home: parents valued the authority of early years staff in encouraging oral health routines, while staff highlighted the importance of trust and clear communication to support shared responsibility. (2) Embedding oral health in practice: staff were motivated to promote oral health and often created innovative activities, such as songs, role play, and links to healthy eating, which families reported as beneficial. (3) Sustaining oral health beyond the setting: parents acknowledged that maintaining routines at home could be difficult, but described how structured practices within early years settings, alongside peer influence and regular reinforcement, supported children's engagement. Both groups recognised the value of early years settings in supporting oral health but highlighted some inconsistency in delivery and uncertainty around roles. While structured routines were seen as effective, sustaining behaviours beyond the settings remained a challenge.

conclusionEarly years settings have strong potential to promote children's oral health. Building on existing creativity, consistent training, clear communication, and stronger links with dental services could help ensure these efforts are sustained and equitable.

Indexed as

Caregivers/education [MeSH]Dental Caries/prevention & control [MeSH]Early years settingsHealth Communication/methods [MeSH]Health inequalitiesNurseries, Infant [MeSH]Oral Health [MeSH]Parents/psychology [MeSH]Qualitative Research [MeSH]Thematic analysisToothbrushing/psychology [MeSH]

Identifiers

PMID42152148
PMCPMC13352684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.