Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42152133›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Intellectual and moral well-being as dimensions of human flourishing: the development and validation of a multidimensional scale.

Claudia E Vanney, Belén Mesurado

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claudia E VanneyPhilosophy Institute, Universidad Austral, Pilar, Argentina. cvanney@austral.edu.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6757-3119
Belén MesuradoPhilosophy Institute, Universidad Austral, Pilar, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5907-5854

Funding

John Templeton Foundation 63242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study developed and validated an expanded multidimensional measure of flourishing that incorporates moral and intellectual well-being. Two studies were conducted with university students in Argentina. Study 1 (N = 560) used exploratory factor analysis to identify a 20-item, five-factor structure comprising emotional, social, psychological, moral, and intellectual well-being. Study 2 (N = 427) tested this structure using confirmatory factor analysis, which indicated good fit (CFI = .93, TLI = .92, RMSEA = .04, SRMR = .05). Internal consistency was adequate for the total scale (Ω = .86) and acceptable for most subscales, although moral and intellectual well-being subscales showed lower but acceptable reliability. Convergent validity was supported by positive associations with personal growth, academic engagement, and perseverance. The five-factor model demonstrated superior fit compared to alternative structures, supporting the distinctiveness of moral and intellectual well-being within the broader flourishing construct. These findings extend prevailing models of flourishing by providing empirical support for a more comprehensive conceptualization of well-being. The resulting scale offers a concise and psychometrically robust instrument suitable for research in positive psychology and educational contexts, and may inform interventions aimed at fostering both ethical and intellectual growth.

Indexed as

MoralsPsychological Well-BeingPsychometricsAdolescentAdultArgentinaFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAssessmentCharacter and virtueCharacter educationEudaimoniaFlourishingHappinessPositive psychologyVirtue epistemologyVirtue ethicsWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID42152133
PMCPMC13352849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.