Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2026
Impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on antimicrobial exposure in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remains poorly defined. Drug sequestration within the ECMO circuit has been reported; however, existing evidence is primarily based on ex vivo studies and small clinical series, resulting in conflicting findings with limited clinical applicability. This study aimed to characterize antimicrobial sequestration within different ECMO circuit components and to describe the PK of meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, linezolid, and ceftaroline in critically ill patients receiving ECMO support.
methodsWe conducted a prospective, single-center observational study in critically ill patients receiving ECMO (veno-venous (VV) or veno-arterial (VA)) and treated with meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, linezolid, or ceftaroline. Serial blood samples were collected simultaneously from the patient's arterial line and from pre- and post-membrane oxygenator sampling sites. Non-compartmental analysis was used to derive PK measures, and concentration differences across sampling sites were analyzed to estimate circuit-related drug sequestration. Antimicrobial target attainment was assessed according to established PKPD targets.
resultsA total of 237 samples from 8 patients (4 VV, 4 VA) were analyzed. Limited, component-specific sequestration was observed in the membrane oxygenator for meropenem (9.28% ± 21.6%, p = 0.046) and ceftaroline (14.6% ± 17.5%, p = 0.010), for linezolid it was also identified (10.1% ± 12.3%, p = 0.005), but in tubing and connectors. Piperacillin/tazobactam showed negligible retention. However, when considering the ECMO circuit as a whole, no statistically significant reductions in systemic concentrations were observed for any antimicrobial. PK measures were generally consistent across sampling sites. In 20% of treatments, predefined PKPD efficacy targets were not achieved.
conclusionsAntimicrobial sequestration within the ECMO circuit is detectable and drug- and component-specific. However, overall impact on systemic antimicrobial exposure appears limited. Inadequate PKPD target attainment in a subset of antimicrobial treatments likely reflects the marked PK variability of critical illness rather than ECMO-related drug loss alone. These exploratory results support the use of therapeutic drug monitoring to individualize antimicrobial therapy in ECMO-supported patients and the need to conduct further population PK studies to better characterize determinants of antimicrobial exposure and to clarify the clinical relevance of circuit-related drug sequestration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.