ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2026
New policies, old habits: why and how Dutch mental healthcare moves towards collaboration.
Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHindered by staff shortages, high workloads and rising waiting lists, mental healthcare services across Europe struggle to provide accessible, appropriate, and timely care for those who need it. In the past, governments tried to tackle large-scale issues in mental healthcare with profound policy changes, such as deinstitutionalization, decentralization and marketization. In the Netherlands, where mental healthcare is also under pressure, many policymakers and other influential stakeholders believe that policy changes aimed at stimulating collaboration between providers, third-party payers and other domains are a solution to the increasing challenges. This research analyses how a collaborative logic unfolds in a complex sector dominated by a market logic.
methodsBy analyzing policy documents and conducting interviews with representatives of healthcare organizations and health insurers, we explored both the systssemic and cultural barriers that challenge collaboration in mental healthcare.
resultsFindings show that, while collaboration is framed as a key strategy to resolve issues in mental healthcare, the entrenched market logic has fostered negative perceptions and lasting mistrust between mental healthcare stakeholders. These perceptions make collaboration difficult.
conclusionChallenges related to collaboration are not only systemic or financial in nature but are deeply rooted in belief systems, norms and values. A fundamental shift in these areas is essential to foster a more cooperative practice in mental healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.