ReviewThrombosis journal2026
Pooled estimate of anticoagulation control with warfarin therapy among adult patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Thrombosis journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWarfarin is widely used to prevent thromboembolic events; however, achieving optimal anticoagulation control remains challenging. In Africa, Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) is generally low, and no nationally representative pooled estimate exists for Ethiopia.
objectiveTo estimate adequate anticoagulation control (TTR ≥ 65%) among adult patients receiving warfarin therapy in Ethiopia.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251271413). Databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, African Journals Online, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to December 10, 2025. Observational studies conducted in Ethiopia among adult warfarin users reporting TTR were included, while studies lacking relevant outcomes or involving non-adult populations were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. A random-effects model was applied to estimate pooled anticoagulation control, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the I² statistic.
resultsSix studies comprising a total of 2,022 participants were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. All studies were retrospective cross-sectional and conducted among adult patients receiving warfarin therapy in hospital settings across Ethiopia. The pooled estimate of adequate anticoagulation control (TTR ≥ 65%) was 34.30% (95% CI: 28.16–40.44), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 79.09%). The mean TTR ranged from 29% to 47.24% across the included studies. Subgroup analysis showed relatively higher anticoagulation control in Addis Ababa (39.29%) compared to other regions (Amhara and Oromia) (22.19%).
conclusionAnticoagulation control among Ethiopian patients on warfarin is suboptimal. Strengthening anticoagulation management services and establishing dedicated clinics are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.