Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42152055›Full record

SynthesisBMC medicine2026

Mpox severity and mortality in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fabrice Zobel Lekeumo Cheuyem, Jude Tsafack Zefack, Chabeja Achangwa, Rick Tchamani, Constantine Tanywe Asahngwa

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. First Comprehensive Global Bibliometric Analysis of Monkeypox Virus Research Landscape From 1976 to 2025.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fabrice Zobel Lekeumo CheuyemDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé, Cameroon. zobelcheuyem@gmail.com.
Jude Tsafack ZefackDepartment of Global Health and Bioethics, Euclid University, Bangui, Central African Republic.
Chabeja AchangwaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of West Indies, Bridgetown, Barbados.
Rick TchamaniCentral Africa University Institute of Excellence, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Constantine Tanywe AsahngwaDepartment of Anthropology, The University of Yaoundé 1, Yaoundé, Cameroon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMpox presents a significant public health threat with variable severity driven by viral clades and host factors. After over 50 years of outbreaks, this study aimed at providing a comprehensive continent-wide assessment of its severity and mortality for evidence-based public health planning and clinical management.

methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted per PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251133745), aggregated data from studies on mpox severity and mortality in Africa from 1970 to 2025. A systematic search of multiple databases was performed. The primary outcomes were the mpox severity rate (proportion of severe cases among confirmed cases) and the case fatality rate (CFR). Random-effects models were used due to high heterogeneity.

resultsThe pooled severity rate among confirmed mpox cases in Africa was 43.8% (95% CI: 36.3-51.6; n = 5,417; 37 reports). The pooled CFR was 3.8% (95% CI: 1.9-7.6; n = 6,877; 43 reports) for confirmed cases and 2.5% (95% CI: 1.3-4.6; n = 3,815; 47 reports) for suspected cases. A significant temporal decline was observed; after the 2022 global outbreak, the CFR for confirmed cases dropped to 1.04% from 6.50% beforehand. Substantial geographical disparities existed, with the Central African region bearing the highest burden (severity: 45.51%; CFR: 5.44%), compared to West Africa (severity: 25.43%; CFR: 0.97%). Infections with Clades Ia and Ib were associated with higher severity, whereas Clade II was linked to milder disease. Key risk factors for severe outcomes and death included young age (< 10 years), HIV coinfection, lack of prior smallpox vaccination, and pregnancy. Community-based studies reported higher CFRs than hospital-based studies. No significant publication bias was detected, and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the pooled estimates.

conclusionsThis study confirms a high but declining burden of severe and fatal mpox in Africa, characterized by significant temporal, geographic, and clade-specific variations. While a global shift towards milder disease is evident, Central Africa remains disproportionately at risk due to the persistent circulation of more virulent clades and underlying health inequities. Sustained investment in surveillance, vaccination, and strengthened healthcare capacity in endemic regions is crucial to reduce future morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

Mpox, MonkeypoxAfricaDisease OutbreaksHumansSeverity of Illness IndexAfricaEpidemiologyMeta-analysisMonkeypoxMortalityMpoxSeveritySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42152055
PMCPMC13353000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.