Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42152033›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

A study on the current status of collaboration between China's commercial health insurance and medical institutions and improvement strategies.

Panpan Ma, Wenjie Si, Ying Zhou, Liyan Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Panpan MaDepartment of Western Campus Affairs Management, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng Dist., Beijing, 100730, China.
Wenjie SiDepartment of International Medical Services, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng Dist., Beijing, 100730, China. swjpumch@hotmail.com.
Ying ZhouDepartment of International Medical Services, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng Dist., Beijing, 100730, China.
Liyan HuangDepartment of International Medical Services, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng Dist., Beijing, 100730, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundActing as a supplement to China's basic medical insurance, the overall development of commercial health insurance in China remains immature. Commercial health insurance institutions collaborate with medical institutions to provide healthcare services for their insured patients. This study aims to understand the current status of those two parties' collaboration, and evaluate the factors that influence their partnership, thereby providing empirical evidence and improvement strategies for fostering their healthier collaboration and achieving a win-win scenario, which will contribute to the high-quality medical services to the public.

methodsA questionnaire survey was conducted among 616 medical institution personnel and commercial health insurance professionals from approximately ten regions across China. A measurement model was employed to examine the validity and reliability of the evaluation questionnaire, and then empirical analysis was used.

resultsSurvey respondents from commercial health insurance institutions perceived that medical workers have limited understanding of commercial health insurance. Over 85% of respondents from both groups indicated that medical workers should enhance their knowledge in the coverage and claim rules of commercial health insurance. Regarding medical behaviors which will affect claim settlement or be identified as insurance fraud, "the medical record is not detailed" (80.14%) was identified as the primary concern for insurance institutions, while "the treatment plan is inconsistent with the diagnoses in the medical record" (67.48%) was the main concern for medical institutions. Regarding improving medical behaviors, insurance institutions hope that hospitals can avoid breaking down service times, prescribe reasonable examinations and charge fairly; Meanwhile, medical institutions hope that insurance institutions can "arrange a dedicated person to explain insurance-related questions".

conclusionsTo improve their collaboration, commercial health insurance institutions can simplify claim process, design multi-level products to give full play to their supplementary role, and cooperate with medical institutions to strengthen publicity and education for medical workers and patients on insurance policies and rules. Government agencies should introduce more legislation to regulate patients' and medical workers' behaviors to curb insurance fraud. Medical institutions, in coordination with government agencies and insurance institutions, should explore mechanisms for medical data sharing to regulate medical workers' medical behaviors and help insurance institutions to innovate product designs. Based on survey findings from 616 respondents, this study identifies potential strategies that may improve collaboration between commercial health insurance and medical institutions. Further research is needed to evaluate whether these strategies effectively improve patient services.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorInsurance, HealthQuality ImprovementChinaFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesCollaborationCommercial health insuranceImprovement strategiesMedical behaviors

Identifiers

PMID42152033
PMCPMC13361106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.