ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Energy expenditure in women who participate to recreational mini-trampoline activities.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to calculate and compare aerobic and anaerobic energy expenditure in women participating in recreational mini-trampoline activities.
methodsThirteen women volunteered to participate in this study. Cardiorespiratory and metabolic variables-including [Formula: see text] (L/min), [Formula: see text] (ml/min/kg), [Formula: see text] (ml/beat), HR (bpm), [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], RER, [Formula: see text] (L/min), FAT (g/h), METs, and [Formula: see text] (L/min) were measured using a portable gas analyzer (Cortex Metamax 3B). The mini-trampoline protocol was structured to progressively increase exercise intensity over a 5-minute period (2 and a half min aerobic rhytym; 2 and a half min anaerobic rhytym intensity), with load progression achieved through gradual increases in jump amplitude and movement frequency. The exercise protocol was performed to an instrumental music track characterized by a constant tempo of 128 bpm, a regular 4/4 meter, distinct metrical accents, and no lyrics. Although the tempo was kept constant, rhythmic variations were utilized to distinguish between the aerobic and anaerobic phases. Data were analyzed using a paired-samples t-test to compare the phases, with statistical significance set at p < .05.
resultAs a result of the research, there were significant differencies found between Phase 1 (aerobic) and Phase 2 (anaerobic) according to [Formula: see text] (L/min), [Formula: see text] (ml/min/kg), [Formula: see text] (ml/beat), HR (bpm), [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], RER, [Formula: see text] (L/min), FAT (g/h), METS, [Formula: see text] (L/min) variables (p < .001).
conclusionMini-trampoline exercise emerges as a robust and time-efficient training method capable of eliciting significant aerobic and anaerobic responses, alongside high energy expenditure.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.