ArticleBMC women's health2026
Navigating cervical cancer care in Maputo: a mixed-methods analysis of socioeconomic inequities in patient pathways and health system barriers.
Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer is largely preventable and curable when detected early, yet late diagnosis remains common in sub-Saharan Africa. In Mozambique, diagnostic pathways are multi-step and may fail through weak referral continuity, administrative bottlenecks, and delayed diagnostic confirmation. Evidence is limited on where delays accumulate and whether constraints are socially patterned.
methodsWe conducted an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study among 165 women with histologically confirmed cervical cancer receiving care at Maputo Central Hospital, the national tertiary referral facility in Maputo Province, Mozambique. Structured questionnaires and medical record abstraction were used to characterise diagnostic pathways and to examine prolonged symptom-to-diagnosis delay (≥ 180 days) across household wealth quintiles using multivariable regression models. Subsequently, in-depth interviews with a purposive subsample of 20 women were analysed using Tanahashi's coverage framework and the Model of Pathways to Treatment. Quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated through joint display analysis and mechanism-oriented meta-inference to elucidate how socioeconomic position shaped diagnostic delay.
resultsDiagnostic delay was common, and care pathways were complex across wealth groups. Nearly two-thirds of women experienced prolonged delay, with no independent association with household wealth after adjustment. Prolonged delay was associated with higher navigation burden, reflected in multiple pre-diagnosis visits, and greater distance to primary care. Borrowing money to seek care was socially patterned. Qualitative findings indicated that early delays reflected symptom normalization, whereas post-entry diagnostic delays were driven by system-level navigation failures, including unclear referrals, repeated returns, administrative breakdowns, and service disruptions affecting women across socioeconomic strata.
conclusionsAmong women who successfully reached tertiary oncology care in Maputo, prolonged diagnostic delays appeared to reflect shared health-system constraints within referral and diagnostic pathways rather than marked socioeconomic exclusion after entry into formal care. Strengthening referral continuity, diagnostic coordination, and effective coverage across primary and secondary care levels may help reduce delays more equitably and narrow gaps in diagnostic completion within the public referral system. Because the study population was limited to women who successfully accessed tertiary services, these findings may underestimate socioeconomic inequities occurring earlier in the pathway, including barriers to initial access and referral completion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.