ArticleBMC health services research2026
A critical realist exploration of hospital staff experiences of using nutrition dashboard technology.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Nutrition Dashboard is a validated nutrition informatics tool to display hospitalised patient food intake data. Despite demonstrated potential for malnutrition identification, research regarding the conditions required for successful implementation of the Nutrition Dashboard is lacking. This study explores dietitians' and food service staff's experiences with the Nutrition Dashboard to understand contextual factors and mechanisms shaping its use.
methodsUsing critical realism methodology, semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with 17 dietitians and seven food service staff across nine hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Data were thematically analysed before retroductive reasoning to generate Context-Mechanism-Outcome (CMO) statements that explore Nutrition Dashboard use.
resultsFive themes and CMO statements were evident: 1) Visibility and recognition: when food service staff see their data influence patient care, their increased engagement and data accuracy contributes to professional efficacy. 2) Partners in nutrition care: valued partnerships between food service staff and dietitians are enabled through communication and recognition, strengthening collaboration and nutrition care. 3) Education makes data meaningful: training on dashboard functionality and clinical value improves data accuracy and use. 4) Optimising data and systems: Nutrition Dashboard data has potential to enable efficient, technology-supported nutrition care through improved workflows and automation. 5) Proactive nutrition care: nutrition risk surveillance through Nutrition Dashboard data offers potential for objective, proactive and targeted care and improved nutrition outcomes.
conclusionThe Nutrition Dashboard's value and acceptability depend on more than technical functionality and accuracy. Relational mechanisms, meaningful training and workplace structures and supports are essential to effective implementation, especially when the technology spans professional boundaries. Genuine partnership between food service staff and dietitians, including mutual respect and communication are identified key factors contributing to acceptability of the Nutrition Dashboard. These findings offer actionable recommendations for health services implementing nutrition informatics technology, such as the Nutrition Dashboard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.