Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151997›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Women intend to buy, and attend more to, healthy foods in supermarkets: attention to product placement observed in women in a 2-dimensional simulated supermarket environment.

Sarah Muir, Sarah Jenner, Sarah Crozier, Charlotte E Lee, Hayward J Godwin, Hannah Payne, Olivia M Maynard, Marcus R Munafò, Christina Vogel, Janis Baird

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarah MuirMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. s.muir@soton.ac.uk.
Sarah JennerSchool of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, University Road, Southampton, S017 1BJ, UK.
Sarah CrozierMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Charlotte E LeeSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, University Road, Southampton, S017 1BJ, UK.
Hayward J GodwinSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, University Road, Southampton, S017 1BJ, UK.
Hannah PayneMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Olivia M MaynardSchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Beacon House, Queens Road, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UK.
Marcus R MunafòVice Chancellor's Office, The Chancellors' Building, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Christina VogelMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Janis BairdMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch in real supermarkets can be challenging due to competing health and business agendas. This study used a 2-dimensional (2D) simulated supermarket to investigate whether visual attention to, and intended purchase of, products in prominent store locations (checkout, end-of-aisle, store entrance) differed for healthy, unhealthy or non-food items. The study also explored if these findings were modified by participants' level of educational attainment.

methodsWomen from Wessex, UK, took part in one of two trials. Phase 1: 201 women completed an online questionnaire in which all participants viewed simulated supermarket journeys depicting healthy, unhealthy and non-food product routes, starting at the store entrance and ending at the checkout, in a random order. Participants clicked on items (i) that they were interested in and then (ii) that they wished to purchase. Phase 2: 71 women participated in an eye-tracking study in which all participants again viewed all journey types, followed by a series of side-by-side preferential looking scenes to allow comparison of attention between the three product types, presented in a random order. Twelve participants took part in semi-structured interviews to better understand their views on what influences product attention; data were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsPhase 1: Participants demonstrated higher attention to food items compared to non-food items but their intention to purchase was higher for healthy foods than both unhealthy and non-food items. Phase 2: there was no difference in attention across product types during the journey task. In the preferential looking task, participants spent more time viewing healthy products than unhealthy or non-food products. Participants also exhibited higher intention to purchase healthy products than unhealthy or non-food items. Interview participants used shopping lists and avoided certain aisles to prevent unhealthy purchases. They wanted to see healthy foods or essential non-food options at prominent store locations.

conclusionsWomen intend to make more healthy purchases than unhealthy purchases when they shop but supermarket strategies to promote less healthy foods in prominent locations in stores may undermine this intent. These findings support the use of prominent positioning of healthier items in stores as a useful strategy to increase healthy sales and support current and planned food policies.

trial registrationThis was a quasi-experimental study of participants' attention in an online questionnaire (phase 1) and an eye-tracking study (phase 2) and trial registration was not required. Participants did not receive an intervention.

Indexed as

AttentionConsumer BehaviorFood MarketsIntentionAdultEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomYoung Adult2-dimensional simulated supermarketBehaviourFoodFood policyFood retailVisual attention

Identifiers

PMID42151997
PMCPMC13362013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.