ArticleGenome biology2026
Human SRD5A1 as a case of gene expression indel-resistance in triple-coding region.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNucleotide sequence can be translated in three reading frames producing distinct protein products. Many examples of RNA translation in two reading frames (dual coding) have been identified so far.
resultsWe report translation of mRNA transcripts derived from SRD5A1 locus in all three reading frames that result in the synthesis of long polypeptides. This occurs due to initiation at three nearby AUG codons occurring in all three reading frames. Only one of the three proteoforms contains the conserved catalytical domain of SRD5A1 produced either from the second or the third AUG codon depending on the transcript. Paradoxically, ribosome profiling data and expression reporters indicate that the most efficient translation would produce catalytically inactive polypeptide. While phylogenetic analysis suggests that the long triple decoding region is specific to primates, occurrence of nearby AUGs in all three reading frames is ancestral to placental mammals. This suggests that their evolutionary significance belongs to regulation of translation rather than biological role of their products. By analysing multiple publicly available ribosome profiling data and with gene expression assays carried out in different cellular environments, we show that relative expression of these proteoforms is mutually dependent and varies across environments supporting this conjecture. We show that a remarkable feature of triple decoding is its resistance to frameshift causing variants with apparent implications to clinical interpretation of genomic sequence variants.
conclusionsWe argue for the importance of identification, characterisation and annotation of productive RNA translation irrespective of the presumed biological roles of its products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.