ArticleParticle and fibre toxicology2026
Pulmonary toxicity of brake wear particles: effects of composition and surface reactivity.
Article in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAirborne brake wear particles (BWPs) are increasingly recognized as important non-exhaust contributors to urban particulate pollution; however, their inhalation toxicity and the key determinants of their pulmonary effects remain poorly defined.
resultsTwo types of BWPs were generated using a brake dynamometer equipped with non-asbestos organic (NAO) and low-metallic (LM) brake pads on a cast-iron disc. The ≤ 2.5 μm fractions of BWPs generated from the NAO and LM brake pads were designated NAO
conclusionsThese data indicate that NAO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.