Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151964›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2026

Classification of different light colors applied during the incubation period based on small intestine morphology with XGBoost algorithm.

Uğur Şen, Elif Cilavdaroğlu, İsa Coşkun, Cem Tırınk, Gökhan Filik, Hüseyin Çayan, İrem Ceren Kızılköy, Olatunbosun Odu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Uğur ŞenDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, TR55139, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6058-1140
Elif CilavdaroğluDepartment of Plant and Animal Production, Samsun Vocational School, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, TR55100, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8258-2416
İsa CoşkunDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir, TR40100, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5495-6006
Cem TırınkDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Iğdır University, Iğdır, TR76000, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6902-5837
Gökhan FilikDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir, TR40100, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4639-3922
Hüseyin ÇayanDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir, TR40100, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7731-2967
İrem Ceren KızılköyDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Kırşehir, TR40100, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4929-6159
Olatunbosun OduDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria. o.odu@ui.edu.ng.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1274-6902

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLight is a significant environmental stimulus affecting embryonic development during incubation, and it is known that different wavelengths can have distinctive effects on incubation performance and post-hatching physiological characteristics. However, the extent to which the traces left by different light colors applied during incubation on the small intestine morphology of chicks can be classified has not yet been sufficiently clarified. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the classifiability of different light colors (red, white, and green) applied during incubation based on the small intestine morphological characteristics of chicks using the XGBoost algorithm.

methodsFertilized eggs were incubated under red, green, white, or dark conditions. At hatching, the small intestines of chicks were excised and divided into the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. The villus characteristics in the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and examined using an image analysis programme. Villus height, crypt depth, and morphological ratios based on these, obtained from the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, were used as classification inputs.

resultsThe XGBoost model was trained over different hyperparameter combinations, and the best performance was achieved with max_depth = 5, eta = 0.1, and nrounds = 100. Optimized with 5-fold cross-validation, the model achieved 78.95% accuracy in classifying light groups in an independent test set. Furthermore, the macro precision, macro recall, and macro F1-score of the model were 0.7896, 0.7930, and 0.7878, respectively. These findings demonstrate that different light colors applied during incubation create discernible structural changes in the small intestine morphology of chicks, and these differences hold promising potential for classification using machine learning methods.

conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that intestinal histomorphology has promising biomarker potential not only for assessing biological effects but also for determining incubation lighting conditions using machine-learning-based approaches. The study reveals that using predictive models to explain the biological effects of incubation lighting can be an important tool for sustainable poultry production.

Indexed as

ChickensIntestine, SmallLightAnimalsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsChick EmbryoColorIncubation lightingLight colorsMachine learningPoultrySmall intestine morphologyXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42151964
PMCPMC13361658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.