ArticleBMC oral health2026
Tooth survival following pulpectomy in primary molars with apical periodontitis and preoperative factors associated with failure: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong-term survival data for pulpectomy in primary molars with apical periodontitis (AP) remain limited. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the tooth survival following pulpectomy in primary molars with AP and to identify factors associated with failure.
methodsDental records of healthy children aged 3-6 years who underwent pulpectomy in at least one primary molar between 2019 and 2021 at Mahidol University were reviewed. Teeth were included when preoperative radiographs showed findings consistent with apical periodontitis. Failure was defined as the presence of clinical symptoms or radiographic progression involving displacement of the succedaneous tooth bud. Tooth survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and restricted mean survival time (RMST) was calculated using a 48-month truncation time. Factors associated with failure were analysed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression with robust cluster variance estimation. Sensitivity analysis was performed using an inverse probability of censoring weighting-adjusted Fine-Gray model to account for documented competing events and potential informative censoring.
resultsA total of 326 primary molars from 242 children were included. Over the observation period, 47 molars (14.4%) failed. The Kaplan-Meier estimated survival probability was 100% at 12 months, 95.4% at 24 months, and 52.02% at 48 months. The RMST at 48 months was 42.77 months. In the primary multivariable Cox model, older age at treatment (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09), preoperative sinus tract (HR 4.98, 95% CI 1.99-12.45), and root resorption involving one-third to two-thirds of the root length (HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.01-8.69) were associated with higher failure hazard. Sensitivity analysis supported the robustness of the association with preoperative sinus tract, whereas the association with age was attenuated and the association with advanced root resorption was less stable. Treatment-level variables, including visit regimen, irrigant type, obturation material, obturation quality, and operator training level, were not associated with failure.
conclusionsWithin the limitations of this retrospective single-centre study and the adapted retention-focused outcome framework, pulpectomy in primary molars with AP showed a 48-month Kaplan-Meier survival probability of 52.02% and an RMST of 42.77 months. Preoperative sinus tract showed the most consistent prognostic association with failure, while age remained directionally consistent but less precise, and advanced root resorption should be interpreted cautiously. These prognostic findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation in larger prospective cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.