ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Involving mothers in monitoring their unborn babies during labour: experience from Liberia.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess the impact on perinatal mortality and morbidity of involving mothers in partnership with maternity staff in monitoring their unborn babies.
methodsMothers attending 4 hospitals in Liberia consented and were trained to use doppler ultrasound probes to monitor for abnormalities or changes in fetal heart rates during labour. A range of 120 to 160 beats per minute was chosen as normal. Intermittent auscultation was undertaken sequentially, immediately following the end of every uterine contraction.
resultsOne hundred eleven intrauterine fetal deaths occurred before mothers arrived. Of 6444 mothers with live fetuses at onset of monitoring, 12 (0.19%) delivered Intrapartum stillbirths with 10 having heart rate changes. There were 30 + 1 neonatal deaths (0.48%) including 20 with changes. 658 of the 6432 liveborn neonates (10%) received resuscitation. In this latter group, 360 of 488 (74%) with changes received resuscitation; 298 of 5946 (5%) without changes received resuscitation. 859 of 5948 (14.5%) without changes and 217 (44%) of 495 with changes were delivered by Caesarean section. Overall Caesarean section rate was 17%. Five-min Apgar scores were documented in 6432 newborns: 16 (0.25%), including 12 with changes, had scores of 1 or 2; 43 (0.67%), including 25 with changes had scores of 3 or 4; 149 (2.32%), including 82 with changes had scores of 5 or 6; 6216 (96.5%) had scores of 7 or more including 5866 (94.4%) without changes and 350 (5.6%) with changes. 5562 (95%) of the 5866 babies with no changes had scores of 10 while only 139 of 350 (40%) with changes had Apgar scores of 10. 340 of 6432 monitored had birth asphyxia (5.3%). Many fetuses had abnormal heart rates on arrival: 9 of 16 (56%) with Apgar's 1 or 2; 7 of 43 (16%) with Apgar's 3 or 4; 23 of 149 (15%) with Apgar's 5 or 6. Mothers' comments were mostly positive. Many expressed their empowerment by being included actively in the care of their unborn babies.
conclusionsCompared with other low-resource countries, there were fewer intrapartum stillbirths, fewer neonatal deaths, and less birth asphyxia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.