Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151903›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2026

Exploring the feasibility of a web-based positive psychology program among anaesthesiologists: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods pilot study.

Albert Kam Ming Chan, Carl Ming Sung Chung, Ka Chun Wu, Yeung Yan Stacie Hoi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06148454 (Implementation of Structured Positive Psychology Interventions to Improve Well-being and Resilience Amongst Anaesthesiologists in Hong Kong), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06148454 naunknown statusnot on this map

Implementation of Structured Positive Psychology Interventions to Improve Well-being and Resilience Amongst Anaesthesiologists in Hong Kong

TypeinterventionalSponsorHong Kong College of AnaesthesiologistsRan2023 to 2025Enrolled54ConditionsBurn Out, Stress, Psychological, Well-Being, Psychological, Self-CompassionArmsApp-based Positive Psychology Intervention (A&B), App-based Positive Psychology Intervention (C&D)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Albert Kam Ming ChanDepartment of Anaesthesia, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China. chan.albert.km@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4166-161X
Carl Ming Sung ChungTeengineer - Institute of Positive Psychology, Hong Kong, China.
Ka Chun WuFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9420-6370
Yeung Yan Stacie HoiDepartment of Anaesthesia, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

Medical Protection Society Foundation TMPSF2022164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysician burnout is a global crisis, with Hong Kong doctors reporting a personal burnout rate as high as 72%. Anaesthesiology is considered a high-risk specialty, with high risk of depression and suicide. Time constraints preclude engagement of healthcare professionals with structured psychological interventions despite their known benefits. Web-based positive psychology interventions (PPI) offer an accessible alternative for busy clinicians. This mixed-methods study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of culturally adapted, web-based PPIs for anaesthesiologists in Hong Kong, and through exploratory efficacy assessment, to explore whether PPIs that are focused on personal growth vs. workplace application may have an effect on well-being.

methodsAn explanatory sequential mixed-methods feasibility randomized controlled trial with exploratory efficacy outcomes was employed for this study. Fellows and members of the Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists were randomized (1:1:1) to two experimental groups (Exp1 individual-oriented PPI/Exp2 workplace-oriented PPI) or wait-list control. The intervention consisted of an induction workshop followed by 4 web-based modules with bite-sized exercises and WhatsApp peer discussions over 10 weeks. Primary outcomes (PERMA-Profiler, GAD-7, PHQ-9, PSS-10, Copenhagen Burnout Inventory) and secondary outcomes (SCS-SF, WAMI, WGS) were measured at baseline, post-intervention and one-year follow-up. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore feasibility and participant perceptions.

resultsOne hundred two participants were recruited for the study. Quantitative outcomes were interpreted as exploratory given the limited sample size. Linear mixed model analysis did not demonstrate significant, sustained improvements in primary outcomes across time points between groups. However, Exp1 showed a significant reduction in depression and increase in meaningful work immediately post-intervention, although this was not sustained at one-year follow-up. Qualitative analysis identified six themes, affirming that the blended web-based approach was feasible. Participants' intrinsic motivation and the perceived applicability to professional and personal domains were key enablers of PPIs. PPIs facilitated participants' competence in the face of clinical challenges, and enabled relational building in the workplace. Implementation challenges included waning engagement due to busy schedules and concerns regarding psychological safety within WhatsApp group chats.

conclusionsBite-sized, web-based positive psychology interventions appear feasible and acceptable for time-constrained clinicians such as anaesthesiologists in Hong Kong. In this exploratory feasibility trial, PPIs designed to support the basic psychological needs described in self‑determination theory showed preliminary short‑term benefits for well‑being, but future large-scale efficacy trials should evaluate whether such effects can be sustained through complementary system-level measures, including leadership and organizational initiatives that provide autonomy-supportive environments for healthcare professionals.

trial registrationThe study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06148454) on November 19, 2023.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologistsAnesthesiologyBurnout, ProfessionalInternetInternet-Based InterventionPsychology, PositiveAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHong KongHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsAnaesthesiologyFeasibilityHong KongMixed-methods researchPhysician burnoutPositive psychologyPsychological safetySelf-determination theoryWeb-based interventionWell-being

Identifiers

PMID42151903
PMCPMC13352935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.