Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151882›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2026

A national, multicentre, randomised, controlled, parallel-arms, phase III clinical trial of neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI and chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant CAPOX/FOLFOX and chemoradiotherapy in patients with high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer: study protocol of the MEND-IT II trial.

E Banken, M Borg, I E G van Hellemond, S G van Ravensteijn, H M U Peulen, A E Verrijssen, J Nederend, A W Daniels-Gooszen, T R van Oudheusden, G van Lijnschoten and 22 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07472868 (MEND-IT II), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07472868 phase3not yet recruitingnot on this map

MEND-IT II: Neoadjuvant FOLFOXIRI and Chemoradiotherapy Versus Neoadjuvant CAPOX/FOLFOX and Chemoradiotherapy, Followed by Surgery or a Watch-and-Wait Approach in High Risk Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

TypeinterventionalSponsorJ. W. A. BurgerRan2026 to 2034Enrolled394ConditionsLocally Advanced Rectal CarcinomaArmsFOLFOXIRI, CAPOX, FOLFOX (5-fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin), Chemoradiotherapy, Total mesorectal excision (+/- IORT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors.

E BankenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, 5623 EJ, The Netherlands. evi.banken@catharinaziekenhuis.nl.
M BorgDepartment of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, 5623 EJ, The Netherlands.
I E G van HellemondDepartment of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, 5623 EJ, The Netherlands.
S G van RavensteijnDepartment of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, 5623 EJ, The Netherlands.
H M U PeulenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
A E VerrijssenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
J NederendDepartment of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
A W Daniels-GooszenDepartment of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
T R van OudheusdenDepartment of Radiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
G van LijnschotenDepartment of Pathology, PAMM Laboratory for Pathology and Medical Microbiology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
J G BloemenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, 5623EJ, the Netherlands.
H J T RuttenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, 5623EJ, the Netherlands.
H L van WestreenenDepartment of Surgery, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
J W B de GrootDepartment of Medical Oncology, Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
C VerhoefDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
P J TanisDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
B A GrotenhuisDepartment of Surgery, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
A G J AalbersDepartment of Surgery, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
I M WerterDepartment of Medical Oncology, Rijnstate, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
M D den HartoghDepartment of Radiotherapy, Radiotherapiegroep, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
J A J DoumaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Frisius Medical Center, Location Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.
T G A CalonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
L B J Valkenburg-van IerselGROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
G L BeetsDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
J B TuynmanDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M P W IntvenDepartment of Radiotherapy, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
S M J van KuijkDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
M BerbéeDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
T E BuffartDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J M L RoodhartDepartment of Medical Oncology, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J W A BurgerDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Michelangelolaan 2, Eindhoven, 5623EJ, the Netherlands.
Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group

Funding

ZonMw 11320102410057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTotal neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged as a promising treatment strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), demonstrating higher pathological complete response (pCR) rates and enhanced disease-free survival. However, evidence specifically addressing high-risk LARC and the potential for organ-preserving approaches remains limited. The potential benefit of TNT may be further optimised when administered to patients with specific high-risk characteristics, associated with poor prognosis. The optimal TNT regimen for achieving favourable organ preservation and survival outcomes has not yet been established, as no studies have directly compared triplet-based induction chemotherapy with doublet-based TNT strategies. Consequently, there is considerable heterogeneity in the administration of chemotherapy within TNT regimens in clinical practice.

methodsThis multicentre, parallel-arms, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase III trial will include 394 patients with non-metastasised, high-risk LARC, with WHO-performance status 0-1 and fit for FOLFOXIRI. High-risk LARC is defined as the presence of at least one of the following tumour characteristics: invasion of the mesorectal fascia (MRF) (i.e. T4b or evident invasion), extramural venous invasion (EMVI) grade IV, tumour deposits (TD), ≥ 2 enlarged lateral lymph nodes (LLN) (≥ 7 mm). Patients are informed about TNT versus chemoradiotherapy. Patients who will undergo TNT will be randomised 1:1 between 6 cycles of FOLFOXIRI, followed by chemoradiotherapy (25 × 2 or 28 × 1.8 Gy) or 4 cycles CAPOX/6 cycles FOLFOX, followed by chemoradiotherapy. Patients either undergo surgery or enter a watch-and-wait approach after neoadjuvant treatment. A watch-and-wait approach is considered in case of a clinical complete response (cCR), determined maximal 26 weeks after start of treatment. The primary outcome is complete response rate (i.e. pCR or sustained cCR at 1 year). The main secondary outcomes are disease-free survival, overall survival, regrowth rate, radicality, toxicity and completion rate of neoadjuvant treatment, treatment related toxicity, quality of life, and post-operative morbidity. Patients who are eligible and undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, will be asked to participate in the observational cohort. DISCUSSION: This protocol describes the MEND-IT II study, which compares complete response rates (pCR and cCR) between FOLFOXIRI-based and CAPOX/FOLFOX-based TNT in a homogeneous high-risk LARC population. The results of this study may contribute to optimise neoadjuvant treatment strategies and tailored treatment.

trial registrationOverview of Medical-Scientific Research in the Netherlands (OMON): NL-011486. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT07472868.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyNeoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicFemaleFluorouracilHumansLeucovorinMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasm StagingOrganoplatinum CompoundsPathologic Complete ResponseRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicFluorouracilLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsComplete responseLocally advanced rectal cancerOrgan preservationTotal neoadjuvant therapyWatch-and-wait approach

Identifiers

PMID42151882
PMCPMC13366820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.