Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151877›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Mental health service use after the Van Earthquake: evidence from a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences study.

Demet Topal Koç, Gabriel Picone, Bradley Kamp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Demet Topal KoçDepartment of Health Management, Kırklareli University, Kırklareli, Türkiye. demettopalkoc@klu.edu.tr.
Gabriel PiconeDepartment of Health Management, Kırklareli University, Kırklareli, Türkiye.
Bradley KampDepartment of Health Management, Kırklareli University, Kırklareli, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the long-run effects of disaster exposure on mental health service utilization using quasi-experimental difference-in-differences and event-study design. Using nationally representative Türkiye Health Survey data (2008-2022), we analyze changes in mental health service use following the 2011 Van earthquake. We document a delayed but sustained increase in utilization of approximately 3-4% points, peaking in 2016-2019 and attenuating by 2022. Heterogeneity analyses show larger responses among men and single individuals, while utilization among women remains comparatively lower. Robustness checks, including alternative control groups and wild-cluster bootstrap inference, support the validity of the empirical design. The findings highlight that post-disaster mental health service use may evolve gradually over time, underscoring the importance of long-term recovery planning in middle-income, high-seismic-risk settings.

Indexed as

DisastersEarthquakesMental Health ServicesAdultFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedDifference-in-differencesEarthquake exposureMental health service useNatural disasters

Identifiers

PMID42151877
PMCPMC13360193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.