ArticleBMC primary care2026
Juggling conflicting demands: registered nurses' experiences of goal conflicts in acute illness consultations in primary care - a thematic analysis.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary care includes preventive and acute care, and management of long-term conditions. In Sweden, approximately 40 million annual visits are made to primary care, of which more than 12 million are registered nurse consultations. Registered nurses are often responsible for initial assessments, including triage and prioritization. Timely and accurate assessments are essential, as inappropriate decisions may adversely affect both care quality and patient outcomes. However, demographic changes, rising chronic disease prevalence, and growing expectations for accessible and efficient services continue to strain primary care capacity. Therefore, this study aims to explore registered nurses' experiences of goal conflicts in decision-making during primary care consultations for acute illnesses, with a focus on clinical assessment, prioritization, and their perceived consequences.
methodsA qualitative study using semi-structured focus group discussions was conducted to explore registered nurses' experiences and perspectives. Seven focus group discussions with 27 registered nurses in Sweden were conducted between April and May 2025. A thematic analysis was conducted.
resultsThe results present one overarching theme, Juggling conflicting demands of optimal and timely care with limited resources, and four interrelated themes illustrating these goal conflicts: organizational demands versus quality of care, accessibility versus risk of crowding out, expectations versus adequate resources, and teamwork versus professional autonomy. The findings highlight conflicting organizational, professional, and patient-driven goals that result in ethical dilemmas and ambivalence among registered nurses.
conclusionsThis study indicates that goal conflicts in primary care arise from extensive assessment responsibilities placed on registered nurses without adequate alignment with education, competence, and organizational support. Despite extensive responsibilities for clinical assessment, decision-making, and prioritization, registered nurses have limited influence over organizational conditions, creating an asymmetry between responsibility and authority. These findings suggest a need for improved alignment between roles, competence, and organizational support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.