Observational studyBMC geriatrics2026
The cognitive cost of age-related hearing loss.
Observational study in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAge-related hearing loss (ARHL) or presbycusis is a bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment associated with aging of the structures of the inner ear and auditory pathways and is the most common cause of acquired hearing loss in older adults. Presbycusis is a disabling condition that affects communication and quality of life, and has been associated with poorer cognitive performance. This study aimed to examine the association between ARHL, cognitive screening performance, and hearing-related quality of life in older adults.
methodsThis single-center prospective observational study with cross-sectional analysis included 60 participants aged 60 years and older: 40 patients with presbycusis and 20 control participants with normal hearing or mild hearing loss. Hearing threshold was examined using pure-tone audiometry and expressed as the Pure Tone Average (PTA). Cognitive function was screened using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and quality of life was evaluated using the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening Version (HHIE-S) questionnaire.
resultsOn cognitive screening, most patients with age-related hearing loss scored in the range suggestive of cognitive impairment, and 90% reported reduced hearing-related quality of life. Statistically significant correlations were observed between PTA and both MoCA and MMSE scores, suggesting that hearing threshold is strongly associated with cognitive status. Exploratory analyses also suggested an association between self-reported duration of hearing loss and cognitive screening results, although this finding should be interpreted cautiously.
conclusionIn this sample of older adults, worse hearing thresholds were associated with poorer performance on cognitive screening instruments and with lower hearing-related quality of life. These findings support further investigation of early hearing assessment and rehabilitation in older adults, and indicate the necessity of effective and timely auditory amplification, even in individuals with moderate hearing loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.