ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
From histology to spatial transcriptomics: establishing a lightweight single-patch baseline.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting spatial gene expression from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained histological images is a central challenge in the field of computational pathology. Although many models leverage the spatial context from entire whole-slide images to boost performance, the predictive capability achievable from single, isolated tissue patches remains unexplored. Without this fundamental baseline, it is difficult to fairly measure the marginal benefit of incorporating spatial context. In this study, we established a lightweight, efficient, and reproducible baseline for single-patch gene expression prediction, thereby providing a standardized foundation for future research. We trained various convolution-based pretrained architectures, such as EfficientNet, ResNet, and DenseNet, using a fixed data split and seed on a curated human liver Visium dataset. To assess cross-tissue generalizability, we further validated the proposed baseline on an independent breast cancer spatial transcriptomics dataset. Through full fine-tuning and morphology-preserving augmentation, EfficientNet-B0 achieved a maximum Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) of 0.310 for highly expressed genes on liver tissue, surpassing previous single-patch methods. Furthermore, the model predicted 50 genes with PCC ≥ 0.30 using only 5.3M parameters--2.5× more genes than a ResNet-50-based baseline despite using 5× fewer parameters-suggesting a favorable performance-efficiency tradeoff within this single-patch setting. On the independent breast cancer dataset, EfficientNet-B0 consistently achieved best or near-best performance across all gene sets under both single-donor and multi-donor evaluations, demonstrating stable generalization across tissue types. Subsequent biological analysis reveals that model prediction accuracy is primarily driven by the strength of spatial organization in H&E histology, measured by Moran's I spatial autocorrelation, rather than transcript abundance or chemical properties. Consequently, this work provides a reference for quantifying the contributions of spatial context, multiresolution integration, and architectural complexity in future spatial transcriptomics models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.