ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Sertoli cells as potential agents against mycobacterial infections.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntibiotic-resistant tuberculosis is a worldwide health threat responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths each year. The continuous escalation of multidrug resistance demands efforts to identify effective novel therapy approaches against mycobacteria, where selective pressure on the pathogen is not the only treatment goal. In this perspective, Sertoli cells (SCs), originally considered as "sustentacular cells" in the testis, have been elevated to cells of the immune system owing to their capacity to modulate the immune response. As such, they express immunoregulatory factors with a remarkable phagocytic capacity and anti-bacterial activity. The aim of the present study was to explore whether SCs could play a role in the treatment of mycobacteria infections that, to the best of our knowledge, has never been reported before.
methodsNeonatal porcine SCs monolayer were co-cultured with three different concentrations of Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette and Guerin for 48 h. The phagocytic activity of SCs and the interaction between mycobacteria and SCs have been investigated by the uptake experiment and electron microscopy analysis, respectively. The intra- and extracellular antibacterial activities of SCs have been evaluated by measuring their killing performances.
resultsSCs were shown capable of phagocyting mycobacteria while remaining viable and maintaining ultrastructure integrity. Even at higher mycobacterial concentrations, SCs demonstrated an intracellular killing activity with a Logarithmic reduction of 0.4 Log
conclusionThis study provided evidence that SCs could be a potentially valuable therapeutic tool for the treatment of mycobacterial infections, such as tuberculosis, by exerting a direct and indirect antibacterial action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.