ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
Prediction of HIV-1 sensitivity to broadly neutralizing antibodies using statistical distribution sampling (SDS) technology.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately predicting HIV-1 sensitivity to broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) is a critical step in advancing the development of effective therapeutic and preventive strategies against HIV-1. Due to the virus's extraordinary genetic diversity and rapid mutation rate, traditional experimental methods for assessing bNAb sensitivity are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and limited in scalability. However, current machine learning approaches prioritize feature significance while neglecting to address class imbalance and systematic biases in multi-laboratory datasets. To address these limitations, we develop the Statistical Distribution Sampling (SDS) method, a novel statistical framework that systematically addresses data imbalance and cross-institutional variance. Firstly, the amino acid sequence is converted into a numerical vector via the k-string method. Then, antibodies are classified as effective or ineffective based on IC50/IC80 thresholds, with a stratified random subset selected as the Sampling generator. Each vector dimension's distribution is characterized through histogram analysis and kernel density estimation. Afterwards, 500 data points are sampled from the distribution of each column for each category. The assembled Statistical Distribution Sampling (SDS) matrix integrates column features, which combined with the Sampling generator, produces the final training dataset. Antibody efficacy predictions are ultimately generated through integration with the Random Forest algorithm. This approach enables comprehensive prediction of all database sequences while achieving strong predictive performance. Through 10 independent trials per antibody, our method achieved statistically superior AUC and ACC performance compared to the LBUM and SLAPNAP benchmarks. Moreover, our method demonstrates significantly lower standard deviation across 10 runs than both counterparts, proving its consistent robustness across diverse antibody scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.