ArticleMusculoskeletal care2026
Improving Identification and Management of Modifiable Risk Factors in Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Quality Improvement Project in an NHS Orthopaedic Interface Service.
Article in Musculoskeletal care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHip and knee osteoarthritis are highly prevalent conditions associated with pain, disability and increasing demand on orthopaedic services. Best practice guidance emphasises early identification and optimisation of modifiable risk factors to improve outcomes following joint replacement, yet these are often inconsistently addressed in routine musculoskeletal care. This quality improvement project aimed to improve the consistency with which clinicians identified and acted on key modifiable risk factors during orthopaedic interface consultations.
methodsThe project was conducted in an NHS Orthopaedic Interface Service using the Model for Improvement. A retrospective audit of 291 consultations demonstrated low rates of documented action despite a high prevalence of modifiable risk factors. Four domains were prioritised: excess body weight, smoking, diabetes optimisation and psychosocial factors. A bundle of low-burden interventions was introduced through sequential plan-do-study-act cycles. Prospective monthly sampling of 180 consultations over six months assessed change over time.
resultsAcross 180 prospective consultations, documented action increased from 30% to 78% among consultations where at least one targeted modifiable factor was present. Improvement was clearest for weight-related advice and signposting. Smoking, diabetes and psychosocial findings were limited by small denominators or variable documentation and were interpreted descriptively. The largest increase was observed following introduction of embedded workflow supports, although attribution to any single component is limited by the sequential QI design.
conclusionA simple quality improvement bundle was associated with improved documentation of action on modifiable risk factors during routine osteoarthritis consultations, particularly for weight-related advice and signposting. Embedded documentation prompts may support more reliable care processes, but further work is needed to assess sustainability, patient-level outcomes and transferability to other settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.