ArticleInternational journal of hematology2026
Darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia in myelodysplastic syndromes: a post-marketing surveillance study in Japan.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-marketing surveillance was conducted in Japan (2015-2024, UMIN000056049) to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa for anemia with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) for 5 years after treatment initiation. Among 1834 patients (median age: 79.0 years), the distribution of International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) risk categories was: Low, 39.3%; Intermediate-1, 45.1%; Intermediate-2, 7.7%; and High, 2.8%. The median (range) administration duration, dosing interval, and weekly dose were 330.0 (1-1863) days, 1.7 (0.2-41.5) weeks, and 240.0 (30.0-250.0) µg, respectively. Treatment discontinuation reasons included inadequate response (36.9%) and adverse events (AEs) (31.2%). AEs were reported in 75.1% and included pneumonia (16.6%) and transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (9.0%). Mean hemoglobin concentration (n = 1821) increased from 7.6 g/dL at baseline to > 9.0 g/dL after 52 weeks. Red blood cell transfusion volume decreased by ≥ 50% compared with baseline in 65.2% of patients. In transfusion-dependent patients (n = 909), the highest transfusion-independence rate was 40.9% at year 4-5. Five-year overall/leukemia-free survival rates (n = 1826/1814) by IPSS risk group were: Low, 49.5%/48.8%, Intermediate-1, 31.1%/30.2%, Intermediate-2, 11.9%/10.4%, and High, 0%/0%. Poor prognostic factors for MDS were IPSS risk category, age, chromosomal abnormalities, and platelet count. No new safety or effectiveness concerns were identified.Trial registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network; study ID: UMIN000056049.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.