Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151658›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Comparing the Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Technology with 6th Year Dental Students for the Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bone Lesions of the Mandible in Panoramic Radiography.

Sita Songsiriritthigul, Jiratchaya Sriphet, Jirutchaya Suphan, Dheeratt Choengprapakorn, Pongsapak Wongratwanich, Puripong Suthisopapan, Natchalee Srimaneekarn

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sita SongsiriritthigulFaculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand. sita.song@kkumail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6407-6462
Jiratchaya SriphetFaculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Jirutchaya SuphanFaculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Dheeratt ChoengprapakornDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Pongsapak WongratwanichDivision of Oral Diagnosis, Department of Oral Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Puripong SuthisopapanDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Natchalee SrimaneekarnDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Salaya, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the potential role of artificial intelligence (AI) as a diagnostic support tool for inexperienced clinicians by comparing its diagnostic performance and time efficiency with those of sixth-year dental students in detecting mandibular inflammatory bone lesions on panoramic radiographs. A total of 412 radiographs, taken between 2013 and 2023 from the Faculty of Dentistry, Khon Kaen University, were retrospectively collected and categorized into lesion-present (n = 192) and lesion-free (n = 220) groups, including osteomyelitis (OM), radiation-induced osteomyelitis, osteoradionecrosis, and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. All images were annotated by an oral and maxillofacial radiologist and surgeon using the Roboflow platform. A You Only Look Once version 8 (YOLOv8)-based deep learning detection model was developed and evaluated using an independent test set. In parallel, 20 sixth-year dental students assessed a standardized test set of 10 panoramic radiographs (6 lesion-present and 4 lesion-free images), with diagnostic accuracy and interpretation time recorded. On an independent test set (n = 62), the AI model achieved an accuracy of 97.18% with 94.87% sensitivity and 100% specificity. When evaluated on the same standardized 10-image test set used for student comparison, the model demonstrated 90% accuracy with 100% sensitivity and 75% specificity, whereas the students achieved a mean accuracy of 29.5% (sensitivity 33.33%, specificity 23.75%; P < 0.001). The AI model also required significantly less interpretation time (0.274 s) than the students (274.05 s, P < 0.001). These findings suggest that AI demonstrates strong diagnostic capability and substantial time efficiency in detecting mandibular inflammatory bone lesions on panoramic radiographs and may serve as a valuable supportive tool to enhance diagnostic accuracy, particularly in reducing missed lesions, among less experienced clinicians.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningOsteomyelitisOsteoradionecrosisPanoramic radiography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.