Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42151589›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Assessing upper limb function: the Spanish version of the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS): cross-cultural adaptation and clinimetric properties.

Arantxa Gómez-Ortega, Francesca Lunardini, Natacha León, Jesús Tornero, Raquel Cantero

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arantxa Gómez-OrtegaCenter for Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital Los Madroños, M-501, Km 17, 900, 28690, Madrid, Brunete, Spain. 241190@uma.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8428-6246
Francesca LunardiniHospital Los Madroños Foundation, Madrid, Spain.
Natacha LeónCenter for Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital Los Madroños, M-501, Km 17, 900, 28690, Madrid, Brunete, Spain.
Jesús TorneroCenter for Clinical Neuroscience, University Hospital Los Madroños, M-501, Km 17, 900, 28690, Madrid, Brunete, Spain.
Raquel CanteroUniversidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore than 70% of stroke survivors suffer from upper extremity paresis, which limits the ability to perform activities of daily living. To guide rehabilitation, specific tools that accurately evaluate upper limb function are essential. The Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS) is a stroke-specific assessment tool that evaluates functional capacity of the upper limb. It is quick to administer, requires no specialized equipment, and is a cost-effective option for routine clinical use.

objectiveThe aims of this study were to adapt the SULCS transculturally to Spanish and to examine its clinimetric properties.

methodsFor cross-cultural adaptation to Spanish, we employed a "translation/back-translation" approach and evaluated its feasibility in routine neurorehabilitation. A multicenter study was conducted in Spanish post-stroke patients (n = 56) to validate the clinimetric properties of the instrument.

resultsThe translation into Spanish was completed without major difficulties. Reliability analysis, including test-retest and inter-operator, demonstrated almost perfect agreement for the Spanish SULCS, with weighted Cohen's kappa values of 0.8755 (95% CI: 0.5991-1.1519) and 0.8988 (95% CI: 0.7343-1.0632) respectively. The minimal detectable change indicated high sensitivity (0.72 at the 95% confidence level). The SULCS showed excellent concurrent validity with the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (r = 0.9533), the Action Research Arm Test (r = 0.9730), and the Box and Block Test (r = 0.9247). No floor or ceiling effects were observed.

conclusionsThe Spanish version of the SULCS presented excellent clinimetric properties. Its characteristics make it a useful tool for assessing upper limb functional capacity in the Spanish post-stroke population.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonStrokeUpper ExtremityActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSpainStroke RehabilitationTranslatingClinimetric propertiesFunctionalityNeurological assessmentOccupational therapyRehabilitationReliabilityStrokeUpper limbValidity

Identifiers

PMID42151589
PMCPMC13183723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.