ArticleNature biomedical engineering2026
Bridging the interpretability gap for medical artificial intelligence models using class-association manifold learning.
Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Explainability has increasingly become a core requirement for intelligent medical devices. Current medical artificial intelligence (AI) technologies suffer from the 'interpretability gap' despite tremendous efforts for enhancing explainability. Here we propose class-association manifold learning, a generative approach that enhances explainability of medical AI models. Our method efficiently decouples common decision-related patterns from individual backgrounds, enabling us to represent global class-associated knowledge in a low-dimensional mapping while preserving near-perfect diagnostic accuracy. The extracted knowledge is further used to enable AI-generated modifications on arbitrary samples and visualize differential diagnosis rules. Moreover, we develop a topology map to model the entire decision rule set, so that the logic underlying black-box models can be intuitively explicated by traversing the map and generating virtual contrastive examples. Extensive experiments show that our method not only achieves higher accuracy in explaining the behaviour of medical AI models but also helps with extracting medical-compliant knowledge that are unknown during model training, thus providing a potential means of assisting clinical rule and medical knowledge discovery with AI techniques.
Identifiers
42151577What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.