ArticleGeroScience2026
Identifying a fitness tool in early old-age to predict long-term risk of disability, severe disability, and mortality.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Population ageing has led to an increase in prevalence of old-age disability but whether the risk of disability can be detected early remains unclear. We used ten functioning/fitness measures in early old-age to identify their predictive ability for disability at older ages. A total of 4593 participants of the Whitehall II study, mean age 65.3 years, were followed for a median of 11.00 (IQR 7.25-12.67) years for incident disability [≥ 1 limitation in activities of daily living (ADL)], and severe disability (≥ 2 ADL). We first examined whether the C-statistic for each predictor, considered individually, improved the C-statistic of a model containing age and sex. We then used LASSO regression, using decrements of 0.0001 in a step-wise manner in the lambda regularization parameter to select the most important predictors. Improvement in C-statistic of a new set of LASSO predictors was tested to select the final set of predictors. Among the functioning/fitness measures considered individually, waist circumference had the highest C-statistic for disability [0.6557, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6367-0.6747] and severe disability (0.6868, 0.6582-0.7153). The best set of LASSO predictors (0.6617, 0.6431-0.6804) for incident disability included age, sex, waist circumference, walking speed, timed chair rises, and balance. For severe disability, the predictors were the same without walking speed (0.6955, 0.6678-0.7233). Our findings highlight the importance of obesity measures for risk of disability, and show that a small set of functioning/fitness measures can be useful in identifying individuals at higher risk of disability at older ages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42151572What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.