ArticleNature human behaviour2026
Long-term memory reorganization of navigational episodes.
Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During navigation, the brain builds representations of self-motion and of environmental information for future action. The classic view suggests that these representations consolidate and eventually stabilize. However, there are no data on their fate at extended memory delays. Here we investigated memory of real-world navigational episodes across memory delays of up to three decades. We show that memory of the spatial aspects of these episodes do not achieve a stable state but rather continue to transform for many years. Our data suggest that at any given point in time, spatial memory of navigational episodes is a changing combination of episode-independent schematic information and several interacting spatial representations directly related to a navigational episode, which may show distinct temporal trajectories. Consistent with recent accounts of memory reorganization, we further show that neither current theories of systems consolidation nor classic models of forgetting fully explain spatial memory performance at extended memory delays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.